Saturday, August 11, 2012
On the fight over Ohio Voting law
This scenario has probably been observed in politics once or twice. ;)
Them: "Here's our new great bill, which has X and Y."
(The X part looks wonderful and is loudly touted. The Y isn't so pretty.)
Us: "Nope, we're not having any of that, because of Y. See? It's right
there, and it's ugly."
Them: "Muuuum! He's against X! He's mean!"
The most recent point in case, the brawl between Obama and that other guy's
presidential campaighns about Ohio early voting law: http://www.thenation.com/blog/169284/ohio-early-voting-cutbacks-disenfranchise-minority-voters. (Via (@thenation )
A little more googling produces a host of other articles complementing the picture.
Actually, Fox News does mention both sides of the story, though the article title might be a tad bit misleading. Allright, maybe I'm being nitpicky here.
And here are the words of Obama's advisor David Axelrod (click here to read the rest):
"What that lawsuit calls for is not to deprive the military of the right to vote on the final weekend of the campaign, of course they should have that right," Obama's top campaign advisor David Axelrod told host Chis Wallace on "Fox News Sunday." "What that suit is about is whether the rest of Ohio should have that same right. And I think it's shameful that Governor Romney would hide behind our servicemen and women to try and win a lawsuit to try to deprive other Ohioans of the right to vote."
Monday, August 6, 2012
My own haiku. Brilliant, I think.
Sake already here.
What's Japanese for 'lekhaim'?
Young Earth. Flat Earth.
"... if the only picture of Christ I had was your attitude towards me, I'd run."
Mary Scweitzer, a Christian biologist debating a fundamentalist.
Source: Discover magazine.
Mary Scweitzer, a Christian biologist debating a fundamentalist.
Source: Discover magazine.
People cling to their toys. That includes, drugs, abusive significant others and, "fixed beliefs," i.e. faith. I'm sorry but if this day and age, you still believe that our planet is literally six thousand years old, let's just say you're badly out of touch.
A few exceptionally bright scientists are actually Christian.
One such man is MIT professor Gerald T. Shroeder, the author of
The Science of God. It is very hard to have this kind of knowledge and believe that our planet is literally six thousand years old, in our reference frame.
It is perfectly possible for one clock to show a six-thousand-year time difference and for another -- 14.5 billion years. Both clocks can be right. And you don't need to be Shroeder to know that. Very careful experiments point to the conclusion that time is relative.
If you have devoted the last few years of your life to studying physics -- or if you were willing to drop whatever you're doing in favor of that -- you'd have very little wiggle room left.
The evidence really leaves you only two options: accept it or abandon reason. Yeah, I know, you believers may argue that our power of reason is limited. I agree, though I think it's the best we've got.
But if you were to remain a reasonable individual, what then? Would you just toss your cross?
"Sorry, Jesus, I don't believe in you any more. I'll just go steal, cheat and molest little children like I always wanted to.''
If so, then what can I tell you? Go to hell. Real faith isn't scared of evolution or carbon dating.
Cold Civil War
It amuses me when I hear yet another talking head refer to "the American People." As if the concept had survived the transition to the 21st century. Hello, can anyone see a fence cutting across the nation, the two sides hating each other more than ever?
All right, I exaggerate. September the 11th has united us for a while, and it is safe to say the "American People" don't want anything like that to happen on the soil again, but the exaggeration is much closer to the truth now than it has been during the Reagan years, or even Clinton years.
What prompted me to write all this? This tweet here. After the recent Supreme Court ruling on the Affordable Care Act, he was delighted to point out that Rush Limbaugh had promised to leave the country if the law survived. The author of the tweet followed up with three words: "Start packing, prick."
If you're getting your rotten tomatoes out, save some for me: I loved it and I took great pleasure in retweeting it. Rush himself, I'm sure, must have felt great when he'd insulted a woman from the opposing camp on the radio.
The aggressive rhetoric aimed at de-humanizing the opposition clearly shows that the civil war is on. A cold one, thank goodness.
All right, I exaggerate. September the 11th has united us for a while, and it is safe to say the "American People" don't want anything like that to happen on the soil again, but the exaggeration is much closer to the truth now than it has been during the Reagan years, or even Clinton years.
What prompted me to write all this? This tweet here. After the recent Supreme Court ruling on the Affordable Care Act, he was delighted to point out that Rush Limbaugh had promised to leave the country if the law survived. The author of the tweet followed up with three words: "Start packing, prick."
If you're getting your rotten tomatoes out, save some for me: I loved it and I took great pleasure in retweeting it. Rush himself, I'm sure, must have felt great when he'd insulted a woman from the opposing camp on the radio.
The aggressive rhetoric aimed at de-humanizing the opposition clearly shows that the civil war is on. A cold one, thank goodness.